Flávio Dino
Flávio Dino is a Brazilian politician and lawyer, currently serving as a Minister of Justice and Public Security in the government of President Lula da Silva. Previously, he held the position of Governor of Maranhão from 2015 to 2022, where he was known for his progressive policies and efforts to combat corruption. Dino has been in the news recently due to his involvement in judicial discussions regarding the transparency and control of federal budget allocations in Brazil.
Born on Apr 30, 1968 (58 years old)
Global Media Ratings
Countries Mentioned
| Country | Mentions | Sentiment | Dominance | + Persistence | x Population | = Reach | x GDP (millions) | = Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 33 | 6.03 | 2.75% | +40% | 211,049,527 | 8,138,972 | $1,500,000 | 57,846$ |
| Totals | 33 | 211,049,527 | 8,138,972 | $1,500,000 | 57,846$ |
Interactive World Map
Each country's color is based on "Mentions" from the table above.
Recent Mentions
Brazil:
Flávio Dino also supported the conclusion that Eduardo Bolsonaro's actions were beyond acceptable limits.
5
Brazil:
Flávio Dino is noted for his affinities with Cármen Lúcia and Edson Fachin.
5
Brazil:
Flávio Dino is a Supreme Court minister whose decision was referenced in relation to a case in Roraima.
5
Brazil:
Flávio Dino is the relator of the action concerning parliamentary amendments at the Supreme Federal Court.
5
Brazil:
Flávio Bolsonaro criticized Flávio Dino for his role in the political landscape.
2
Brazil:
Flávio Dino determined that party presidents explain their distribution of parliamentary amendments.
6
Brazil:
Flávio Dino, a minister of the Supreme Federal Court, determined that party presidents must explain their use of parliamentary amendments.
8
Brazil:
Flávio Dino is a minister of the STF whose decisions have impacted the Câmara's actions.
5
Brazil:
Flávio Dino is a minister of the Supreme Federal Court who determined the blocking of funds related to the investigation.
5
Brazil:
Flávio Dino, a minister of the Supreme Federal Court, stated that former parliamentarians and party leaders lack legitimacy to interfere in the allocation of parliamentary amendments.
9